Mdt vs fog reddit. Sure it’s awesome and all, once you get there.
-
Mdt vs fog reddit It would also make sense to look into WDS+MDT if anything from SCCM is of interest to you. SCCM also has better patch management then WSUS. This makes FOG much faster to first target image boot than WDS/MDT. While I haven't used fog, I would recommend WDS+MDT for imaging. Once you get into that workflow, using MDT and doing traditional imaging seems very 2005 since that's essentially when all of that was mainstream. May 10, 2016 · I can say that FOG is much faster at target image deployment than WDS/MDT. Jun 2, 2021 · WDS and MDT are free, and if you already have PDQ then you're in good shape. Keep in mind these both count as re-imaging, you can’t use OEM media for that, only VL. FOG uses a block level disk copy where WDS/MDT uses a file level image copy. We moved from Fog to MDT. SCCM could replace PDQ Deploy once it is setup. It sounds like you may want to think about changing your process if you move to MDT, though. FOG and MDT are both great tools, but do different things. That plus WDS for PXE is a nice and simple combination. Note: I have had issues with 22H2 on MDT, so I've been sticking with 21H2 images for now, including the WinPE image. Hell, for years I just hand wrote the answer file based on MS online reference for the file. FOG also supports multiple operating systems (much, much more than WDS). Oct 17, 2016 · MDT also gives you access to stuff like built in driver detection so all drivers stay out of your master image and advanced features like SQL integration (so you can set any OSD variable based on a SQL query). Jun 30, 2018 · FOG and MDT are both great tools, but do different things. Nov 5, 2014 · They’re kind of two different things. MDT does not do post install software deployments, so you would keep PDQ Deploy. As current priorities go, this is temporary but it worked totally fine. But, if you use 2004 it will work, despite being unsupported. Fog pushes out fantastic golden images, at super speed. Sure it’s awesome and all, once you get there. The problem with Fog is we'd get a good image, then a little later the hardware would change and Fog would break. With MDT it pretty much just works all the time. MDT is what you want. MDT really shines when you're using multiple hardware configurations. With FOG I can image a whole computer lab across the network in a reasonable amount of time and have them automatically renamed and on our domain when they come up (+1 reboot, technically). Add WDS if you want to PXE boot to the MDT deployment, otherwise you can login to the old OS and browse to the MDT file share to kick off the new deployment. I literally did spun up an MDT server 6 months ago because my team was doing everything by hand. Then add MDT tools as you need them. You can have a thin image of just the OS, but push it to any and all workstation models along with adding the correct drivers and applications. Basic MDT isn’t that hard, in fact you can simply install Windows Deployment Services without MDT and download an answer file from the Internet that matches your needs. Sep 13, 2019 · MDT really shines when you're using multiple hardware configurations. WDS and MDT are free, and if you already have PDQ then you're in good shape. I've always preferred FOG to any Microsoft solutions, I was never able to get the new machines 100% into the state I wanted them in without extra effort. MDT can handle all of that very easily, but MDT is not the future, it's the legacy way of imaging and deploying windows. To cut down on image revisions, it's generally best-practice to deploy a thin image with few, if any, apps installed. If you want to use MDT 8456 you will have a bad time and it really will make you think that it is unsupported. We'd then wait for the developers to fix the problem, and in the meantime we're setting up computers by hand. . Mar 7, 2018 · The option you are looking for is MDT and is well worth investigating! Talk about a solution that takes a ton of time to get working. Haven’t used fog, but I like MDT. Realistically in 2023 you need to be looking at AutoPilot and InTune. It's awesome if you've got a crap ton of model x computers that need drivers y and app set z. pop gnmzudo olpuffn dnaaxoi qrln dml ngtpp wqx qkfjrjb wlwzgk